Difference between revisions of "Realism"

From Elite Wiki
m (Astronomy/Physics: Tweak)
(Discussions: Added Redspear's defence of the Elite/Oolite trade model)
Line 30: Line 30:
   
 
*[http://aegidian.org/bb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8581 A moment of existential angst] (2010)
 
*[http://aegidian.org/bb/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8581 A moment of existential angst] (2010)
  +
  +
*[http://aegidian.org/bb/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=17366 Commodity sub-types] (2015+): note [[User:Redspear|Redspear]]'s powerful defence of the Oolite trade model.
   
 
[[Category:Factual]] [[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Factual]] [[Category:Concepts]]

Revision as of 15:13, 19 November 2021

Oolite is modelled on Classic Elite - a very simplistic but very playable game published in 1984. Realism is often seen as conflicting with playability.



Issues with Physics/Science/Economics in Oolite

Classic Elite was written for early computers. David Braben's Frontier series (written a decade later for more powerful computers) tried to import more real-world physics and astronomy into gaming. But Oolite, being a copy of Classic Elite, suffered from the simplicity inherent in the early game. Thus the astronomy, the physics and the economics are all unreal simplifications which, however, combine to make a much more playable game.

As the years have gone by, there have been those pushing for a more realistic approach (originally, some who came to Oolite through Frontier), and other pushing for a more game-focused approach (perhaps those who preferred Classic Elite - Frontier had playability problems). The arguments on each side are good, and the open nature of Oolite means that there are a plethora of OXPs which modify the game in one's desired direction.

Realistic Solutions

Astronomy/Physics

Economics

  • See Economics for a number of attempts to sort out issues with trade and markets.

Playing the game

Discussions