Difference between revisions of "Harrier"
From Elite Wiki
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Notable Features == |
== Notable Features == |
||
+ | |||
+ | There really is nothing that makes the Harrier stand out from its rivals. It has good acceleration and manoeuvrability and, provided a small jump drive is installed, a reasonable amount of cargo space. |
||
== Disadvantages == |
== Disadvantages == |
||
+ | |||
+ | As with many ships of this ilk, it doesn't do a particularly great job in any field. It should be thought of as a stepping stone to greater things. |
||
== Verdict == |
== Verdict == |
||
− | A viable alternative to the |
+ | A viable alternative to the Asp Explorer. Slightly less extreme thrusters and slightly smaller payload, and so on. |
[[Category:FFE]] |
[[Category:FFE]] |
Revision as of 11:45, 25 April 2007
Overview
Similar to an ASP Explorer but has 4 Missile pylons instead of 1.
Notable Features
There really is nothing that makes the Harrier stand out from its rivals. It has good acceleration and manoeuvrability and, provided a small jump drive is installed, a reasonable amount of cargo space.
Disadvantages
As with many ships of this ilk, it doesn't do a particularly great job in any field. It should be thought of as a stepping stone to greater things.
Verdict
A viable alternative to the Asp Explorer. Slightly less extreme thrusters and slightly smaller payload, and so on.