Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trumble"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I was thinking of the consumer base for the product, and thought trumble owners who think of them as pets (vs pests) would be the majority target group of GenFun. (young girls + cavia's). |
I was thinking of the consumer base for the product, and thought trumble owners who think of them as pets (vs pests) would be the majority target group of GenFun. (young girls + cavia's). |
||
--[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 15:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC) |
--[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 15:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | well, see my thinking is that the reason GenFun pushes trumbles so cheaply (and intentionally leaves freebees in space) is to make the real money on the cages. thus a firm name is needed. |
||
| + | :''Trumble-Jail, Trumble-Hold'', actually I quite like ''Trumble-Pen''. --[[User:Murgh|Murgh]] 15:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:59, 25 January 2006
Trumble-cage, sounds negative.
How about Trumble-Mansion-Deluxe,
or Trumble Funhouse, (fun-box?), TrumbleAdventurePlaypen
or Trumblecare Kit Deluxe.
--Arexack 14:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
you think? a trader would need to feel he's getting some security for his money, and by then be too fed up or incompetent to scorch them off..
- Trumble-Nest ? --Murgh 14:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
That would sound like a nightmare to an afflicted trader. :)
I was thinking of the consumer base for the product, and thought trumble owners who think of them as pets (vs pests) would be the majority target group of GenFun. (young girls + cavia's). --Arexack 15:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
well, see my thinking is that the reason GenFun pushes trumbles so cheaply (and intentionally leaves freebees in space) is to make the real money on the cages. thus a firm name is needed.
- Trumble-Jail, Trumble-Hold, actually I quite like Trumble-Pen. --Murgh 15:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
