Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oolite Equipment"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
EQ_Trumble is equipment? ;) |
EQ_Trumble is equipment? ;) |
||
| − | Yes, but not really. It is removed as soon as it is 'installed'. |
+ | Yes, but not really. It is removed as soon as it is 'installed'.--[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 10:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Arexack |
There are several pieces of Naval hardware omited... |
There are several pieces of Naval hardware omited... |
||
| − | --[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 10:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Arexack |
||
| + | A_H |
||
== They should be included == |
== They should be included == |
||
Revision as of 11:13, 5 August 2010
EQ_Trumble is equipment? ;) Yes, but not really. It is removed as soon as it is 'installed'.--Arexack 10:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Arexack
There are several pieces of Naval hardware omited... A_H
They should be included
They need to be included, really (with notes perhaps that they are naval and or expensive). Winston 12:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Categorization
After doing some back-linking to this page I thought about rearranging the category Oolite into Oolite-Ships, Oolite-Equipment, Oolite-Weapons, Oolite-AI, ... . What do you think about this? (I'm not going to change categories on my one) Greetings: Makarius 13:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
-- add OXP equipment? --
should we add it here?
should we add it with a link on the bottom of page to a new category?
should we add a link to the OXP-page?
--Arexack 13:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
-- OXP Equipment --
I think it's a fair idea, since equipment is equipment, native or OXP. Just as long as the desciption is linked to the OXP and clearly marked as not native to Oolite.
--Captain Hesperus 12:50 17 November 2007 (GMT)
