Difference between revisions of "User talk:Svengali"
(added A Plea!) |
m (→A plea!) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I've seen that you have made lots of edits recently. Please, please, can you always use the Summary field when making the edits?? Without, it is difficult to see what has changed when viewing the [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] page. [[User:JazHaz|JazHaz]] 06:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC) |
I've seen that you have made lots of edits recently. Please, please, can you always use the Summary field when making the edits?? Without, it is difficult to see what has changed when viewing the [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] page. [[User:JazHaz|JazHaz]] 06:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :For important bits, sure - I'm already doing it (like ISO8601). But for fixing a typo, templates (self explaining) or talk/user pages it's just a waiste of ressources. btw: some talk pages could need a cleanup (e.g. [[Talk:OXP]] ), no need to carry 3 years old discussions. A short summary and a list of past contributors will be enough, what do you think? |
||
Revision as of 09:45, 9 July 2010
Image:OXPConfig compatible.png is a pretty good example of how not to use images on a MediaWiki. Instead of using a small picture with a white border, you should use a higher-resolution image and use syntax like [[Image:OXPConfig compatible.png|80px]] to show it at a particular size. This would also make Image:OXPConfig compatible60px.png and Image:OXPConfig compatible80px.png redundant. -Ahruman 21:49, 3 October 2008 (BST)
I've uploaded a new version with a higher resolution (and without borders) and muchas gracias for the Category for OXPConfig. BTW: Are imagemaps working? I've tried to use them on my user page without a working result. Svengali 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
A plea!
I've seen that you have made lots of edits recently. Please, please, can you always use the Summary field when making the edits?? Without, it is difficult to see what has changed when viewing the Recent Changes page. JazHaz 06:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- For important bits, sure - I'm already doing it (like ISO8601). But for fixing a typo, templates (self explaining) or talk/user pages it's just a waiste of ressources. btw: some talk pages could need a cleanup (e.g. Talk:OXP ), no need to carry 3 years old discussions. A short summary and a list of past contributors will be enough, what do you think?
