Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bounty Hunter Guild"

From Elite Wiki
(Question on Coluber Pit Vipers)
(Response to the response!)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
----
 
----
  +
 
'''
 
'''
 
Red Herring''': Do you understand how the Coluber ships relate to their names?
 
Red Herring''': Do you understand how the Coluber ships relate to their names?
Line 12: Line 13:
   
 
----
 
----
  +
  +
Coluber is a snake: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_racer, I will be happy to find out the differences for you
  +
tomorrow after my first coffee. Today, I am a bit exhausted, shouldn't even start this page.
  +
  +
Btw, thanks for helping out, really appreciated. :)
  +
  +
Montana05 / 2021-10-08 / 21:22
  +
  +
----
  +
  +
It seems you found the difference in the meanwhile, at least there are link for both ships.
  +
  +
Montana05 / 2021-10-09 / 07:04
  +
  +
----
  +
  +
No, I didn't! I merely found references to both which never explained what the second was, which oxp it was in or anything else. I was looking at that page again just shortly before seeing your message here (I'd written that piece back in December last year!).

Latest revision as of 19:22, 9 October 2021

WIP, please stand by. Cholmondely, if you have time you are very welcome to help out. ;)

Montana05 / 2021-10-08 / 20:18


Red Herring: Do you understand how the Coluber ships relate to their names?

I'm after the difference between Coluber CPV-9333 Pitviper & Coluber CPV-12375 Pitviper Mk. II

I think that the first is Coluber Pitviper. But the second?


Coluber is a snake: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_racer, I will be happy to find out the differences for you tomorrow after my first coffee. Today, I am a bit exhausted, shouldn't even start this page.

Btw, thanks for helping out, really appreciated. :)

Montana05 / 2021-10-08 / 21:22


It seems you found the difference in the meanwhile, at least there are link for both ships.

Montana05 / 2021-10-09 / 07:04


No, I didn't! I merely found references to both which never explained what the second was, which oxp it was in or anything else. I was looking at that page again just shortly before seeing your message here (I'd written that piece back in December last year!).