Difference between revisions of "User talk:Spara"
From Elite Wiki
(Question.) |
(Done. Thanks.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hi. I saw you blanked the [[ADCK's Behemoths Redux]] article. Was there a special reason? Is it perhaps better to delete the page? [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] 12:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. I saw you blanked the [[ADCK's Behemoths Redux]] article. Was there a special reason? Is it perhaps better to delete the page? [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] 12:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Answer == |
||
| + | |||
| + | The content is included into GalNavy Additions oxp. |
||
| + | |||
| + | : Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :: A tricky question. ADCK's Behemoths is from ADCK and Redux version was done by me by cleaning ADCK's mess. I think it should be kept available for archive reasons, but heavily tagged as buggy and non-functional. Linking to GalNavy addition is probably a good idea. |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::: [http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php?title=ADCK%27s_Behemoths&diff=51127&oldid=37633 Done]. Thanks again. [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] 16:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 17:42, 24 January 2016
Question
Hi. I saw you blanked the ADCK's Behemoths Redux article. Was there a special reason? Is it perhaps better to delete the page? Debresser 12:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Answer
The content is included into GalNavy Additions oxp.
- Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on ADCK's Behemoths as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the Galactic Navy Additions OXP instead."? Debresser 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- A tricky question. ADCK's Behemoths is from ADCK and Redux version was done by me by cleaning ADCK's mess. I think it should be kept available for archive reasons, but heavily tagged as buggy and non-functional. Linking to GalNavy addition is probably a good idea.
