User talk:Svengali - Revision history

Debresser: Refer.

2016-01-23T17:38:12Z

Refer.

Debresser: /* Location of new talkpage posts */ new section

2016-01-23T17:33:19Z

‎Location of new talkpage posts: new section

Svengali: Replaced content with 'Drop a note...'

2011-02-03T22:12:39Z

Replaced content with 'Drop a note...'

Svengali at 11:19, 15 July 2010

2010-07-15T11:19:37Z

JazHaz: /* A plea! */ answered

2010-07-13T00:51:42Z

‎A plea!: answered

Svengali at 12:35, 9 July 2010

2010-07-09T12:35:59Z

JazHaz: /* A plea! */ response added

2010-07-09T12:08:29Z

‎A plea!: response added

Svengali: /* A plea! */

2010-07-09T08:45:13Z

‎A plea!

JazHaz: added A Plea!

2010-07-09T06:43:48Z

added A Plea!

Svengali at 20:04, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T20:04:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 23 January 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Is this section located on the top or the bottom of the page? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 17:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)		Is this section located on the top or the bottom of the page? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 17:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	: See [[EliteWiki:Village_Pump#Top_or_bottom]]. [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 17:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:33, 23 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Drop a note...		Drop a note...
		+
		+	== Location of new talkpage posts ==
		+
		+	Is this section located on the top or the bottom of the page? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 17:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 3 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	== A plea! ==
		+	Drop a note...
−
−	I've seen that you have made lots of edits recently. Please, please, can you always use the Summary field when making the edits?? Without, it is difficult to see what has changed when viewing the [[Special:RecentChanges\|Recent Changes]] page. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 06:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
−
−	:For important bits, sure - I'm already doing it (like ISO8601). But for fixing a typo, templates (self explaining) or talk/user pages it's just a waiste of ressources. btw: some talk pages could need a cleanup (e.g. [[Talk:OXP]] ), no need to carry 3 years old discussions. A short summary and a list of past contributors will be enough, what do you think?
−
−	::Yes that would be fine. Have also asked the same of [[User:Smivs\|Smivs]] who has made a few edits without summaries recently. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 12:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
−
−	:::Would be? Changes (like typo fixes) are pretty, but shouldn't produce unnecessary overhead for the database. Maybe I'm wrong, but describing every tiny bit will likely blow up everything. And if necessary there's still the history. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 12:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
−
−	::::Recent Changes gets cleared down regularly, so this shouldn't be a problem. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 00:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
−
−	::::: History is stored for every change - even for talk pages, so using comments/summaries for a typo-fix seems a bit overdosed. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 11:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:19, 15 July 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::::Recent Changes gets cleared down regularly, so this shouldn't be a problem. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 00:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)		::::Recent Changes gets cleared down regularly, so this shouldn't be a problem. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 00:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	::::: History is stored for every change - even for talk pages, so using comments/summaries for a typo-fix seems a bit overdosed. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 11:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 13 July 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:::Would be? Changes (like typo fixes) are pretty, but shouldn't produce unnecessary overhead for the database. Maybe I'm wrong, but describing every tiny bit will likely blow up everything. And if necessary there's still the history. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 12:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		:::Would be? Changes (like typo fixes) are pretty, but shouldn't produce unnecessary overhead for the database. Maybe I'm wrong, but describing every tiny bit will likely blow up everything. And if necessary there's still the history. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 12:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	::::Recent Changes gets cleared down regularly, so this shouldn't be a problem. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 00:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 9 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	[[:Image:OXPConfig compatible.png]] is a pretty good example of how not to use images on a MediaWiki. Instead of using a small picture with a white border, you should use a higher-resolution image and use syntax like <code><nowiki>[[Image:OXPConfig compatible.png\|80px]]</nowiki></code> to show it at a particular size. This would also make [[:Image:OXPConfig compatible60px.png]] and [[:Image:OXPConfig compatible80px.png]] redundant. -[[User:Ahruman\|Ahruman]] 21:49, 3 October 2008 (BST)
−
−	I've uploaded a new version with a higher resolution (and without borders) and muchas gracias for the Category for OXPConfig.
−	BTW: Are imagemaps working? I've tried to use them on my user page without a working result. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
−
	== A plea! ==		== A plea! ==

Line 11:		Line 6:

	::Yes that would be fine. Have also asked the same of [[User:Smivs\|Smivs]] who has made a few edits without summaries recently. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 12:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		::Yes that would be fine. Have also asked the same of [[User:Smivs\|Smivs]] who has made a few edits without summaries recently. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 12:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::Would be? Changes (like typo fixes) are pretty, but shouldn't produce unnecessary overhead for the database. Maybe I'm wrong, but describing every tiny bit will likely blow up everything. And if necessary there's still the history. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 12:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 9 July 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:For important bits, sure - I'm already doing it (like ISO8601). But for fixing a typo, templates (self explaining) or talk/user pages it's just a waiste of ressources. btw: some talk pages could need a cleanup (e.g. [[Talk:OXP]] ), no need to carry 3 years old discussions. A short summary and a list of past contributors will be enough, what do you think?		:For important bits, sure - I'm already doing it (like ISO8601). But for fixing a typo, templates (self explaining) or talk/user pages it's just a waiste of ressources. btw: some talk pages could need a cleanup (e.g. [[Talk:OXP]] ), no need to carry 3 years old discussions. A short summary and a list of past contributors will be enough, what do you think?
		+
		+	::Yes that would be fine. Have also asked the same of [[User:Smivs\|Smivs]] who has made a few edits without summaries recently. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 12:08, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 9 July 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:

	I've seen that you have made lots of edits recently. Please, please, can you always use the Summary field when making the edits?? Without, it is difficult to see what has changed when viewing the [[Special:RecentChanges\|Recent Changes]] page. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 06:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		I've seen that you have made lots of edits recently. Please, please, can you always use the Summary field when making the edits?? Without, it is difficult to see what has changed when viewing the [[Special:RecentChanges\|Recent Changes]] page. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 06:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	:For important bits, sure - I'm already doing it (like ISO8601). But for fixing a typo, templates (self explaining) or talk/user pages it's just a waiste of ressources. btw: some talk pages could need a cleanup (e.g. [[Talk:OXP]] ), no need to carry 3 years old discussions. A short summary and a list of past contributors will be enough, what do you think?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:43, 9 July 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I've uploaded a new version with a higher resolution (and without borders) and muchas gracias for the Category for OXPConfig.		I've uploaded a new version with a higher resolution (and without borders) and muchas gracias for the Category for OXPConfig.
	BTW: Are imagemaps working? I've tried to use them on my user page without a working result. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		BTW: Are imagemaps working? I've tried to use them on my user page without a working result. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== A plea! ==
		+
		+	I've seen that you have made lots of edits recently. Please, please, can you always use the Summary field when making the edits?? Without, it is difficult to see what has changed when viewing the [[Special:RecentChanges\|Recent Changes]] page. [[User:JazHaz\|JazHaz]] 06:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 10 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[:Image:OXPConfig compatible.png]] is a pretty good example of how not to use images on a MediaWiki. Instead of using a small picture with a white border, you should use a higher-resolution image and use syntax like <code><nowiki>[[Image:OXPConfig compatible.png\|80px]]</nowiki></code> to show it at a particular size. This would also make [[:Image:OXPConfig compatible60px.png]] and [[:Image:OXPConfig compatible80px.png]] redundant. -[[User:Ahruman\|Ahruman]] 21:49, 3 October 2008 (BST)		[[:Image:OXPConfig compatible.png]] is a pretty good example of how not to use images on a MediaWiki. Instead of using a small picture with a white border, you should use a higher-resolution image and use syntax like <code><nowiki>[[Image:OXPConfig compatible.png\|80px]]</nowiki></code> to show it at a particular size. This would also make [[:Image:OXPConfig compatible60px.png]] and [[:Image:OXPConfig compatible80px.png]] redundant. -[[User:Ahruman\|Ahruman]] 21:49, 3 October 2008 (BST)
		+
		+	I've uploaded a new version with a higher resolution (and without borders) and muchas gracias for the Category for OXPConfig.
		+	BTW: Are imagemaps working? I've tried to use them on my user page without a working result. [[User:Svengali\|Svengali]] 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)