User talk:Spara - Revision history

Debresser: Done. Thanks.

2016-01-24T16:42:47Z

Done. Thanks.

Spara: /* Answer */

2016-01-24T10:48:23Z

‎Answer

Debresser: Follow up question.

2016-01-23T21:07:49Z

Follow up question.

Spara: /* Question */

2016-01-23T19:20:01Z

‎Question

Debresser: Question.

2016-01-22T12:16:15Z

Question.

New page

== Question ==

Hi. I saw you blanked the [[ADCK's Behemoths Redux]] article. Was there a special reason? Is it perhaps better to delete the page? [[User:Debresser|Debresser]] 12:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 24 January 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	: Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)		: Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

−	: A tricky question. ADCK's Behemoths is from ADCK and Redux version was done by me by cleaning ADCK's mess. I think it should be kept available for archive reasons, but heavily tagged as buggy and non-functional. Linking to GalNavy addition is probably a good idea.	+	:: A tricky question. ADCK's Behemoths is from ADCK and Redux version was done by me by cleaning ADCK's mess. I think it should be kept available for archive reasons, but heavily tagged as buggy and non-functional. Linking to GalNavy addition is probably a good idea.
		+
		+	::: [http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php?title=ADCK%27s_Behemoths&diff=51127&oldid=37633 Done]. Thanks again. [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 16:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 24 January 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:

	: Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)		: Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	: A tricky question. ADCK's Behemoths is from ADCK and Redux version was done by me by cleaning ADCK's mess. I think it should be kept available for archive reasons, but heavily tagged as buggy and non-functional. Linking to GalNavy addition is probably a good idea.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 23 January 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The content is included into GalNavy Additions oxp.		The content is included into GalNavy Additions oxp.
		+
		+	: Thanks for your reply. Should we post a notice on [[ADCK's Behemoths]] as well, something like "This OXP is deprecated, please use the [[Galactic Navy Additions]] OXP instead."? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 23 January 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Hi. I saw you blanked the [[ADCK's Behemoths Redux]] article. Was there a special reason? Is it perhaps better to delete the page? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 12:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)		Hi. I saw you blanked the [[ADCK's Behemoths Redux]] article. Was there a special reason? Is it perhaps better to delete the page? [[User:Debresser\|Debresser]] 12:16, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Answer ==
		+
		+	The content is included into GalNavy Additions oxp.