Talk:Trumble - Revision history

Murgh: tidy

2021-12-18T08:33:25Z

tidy

2006-02-26T16:08:02Z

2006-02-26T16:07:22Z

2006-02-26T13:29:09Z

Killing Trumbles

2006-01-25T20:40:44Z

2006-01-25T18:18:15Z

2006-01-25T16:52:57Z

2006-01-25T16:21:13Z

2006-01-25T15:59:01Z

2006-01-25T15:44:41Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Trumble-cage''', sounds negative.
 How about Trumble-Mansion-Deluxe,
@@ Line 7: / Line 8: @@
 or Trumblecare Kit Deluxe.
 --[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 14:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
-you think? a trader would need to feel he's getting some security for his money, and by then be too fed up or incompetent to scorch them off..
+:You think? a trader would need to feel he's getting some security for his money, and by then be too fed up or incompetent to scorch them off..
 : ''Trumble-Nest'' ? --[[User:Murgh|Murgh]] 14:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
-That would sound like a nightmare to an afflicted trader. :)
+:::That would sound like a nightmare to an afflicted trader. :)
---[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 16:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
+:::::::-my little trumble- ;) --[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 16:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
-: that would be a twisted product dwarfed subspecies with extra big eyes and lashes. [[User:Murgh|Murgh]]
+:::::::: That would be a twisted product dwarfed subspecies with extra big eyes and lashes. [[User:Murgh|Murgh]]
 == Killing Trumbles ==
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 (cjohnson65@houston.rr.com)
-I used to be @houston.rr.com myself :-)
+:I used to be @houston.rr.com myself :-)
-Anyway, hint on trumbles - they don't like heat! [[User:Winston|Winston]] 16:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
+:Anyway, hint on trumbles - they don't like heat! [[User:Winston|Winston]] 16:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 26 February 2006
Line 42:		Line 42:

	I used to be @houston.rr.com myself :-)		I used to be @houston.rr.com myself :-)
−	Anyway, hint on trumbles - they don't like heat! [[User:~~83.218.29.12~~\|~~83.218.29.12~~]] 16:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)	+	Anyway, hint on trumbles - they don't like heat! [[User:Winston\|Winston]] 16:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:07, 26 February 2006
Line 40:		Line 40:
	-Glimmermore		-Glimmermore
	(cjohnson65@houston.rr.com)		(cjohnson65@houston.rr.com)
		+
		+	I used to be @houston.rr.com myself :-)
		+	Anyway, hint on trumbles - they don't like heat! [[User:83.218.29.12\|83.218.29.12]] 16:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 26 February 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:

	: that would be a twisted product dwarfed subspecies with extra big eyes and lashes. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]		: that would be a twisted product dwarfed subspecies with extra big eyes and lashes. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]
		+
		+	== Killing Trumbles ==
		+
		+	Alright, how in the world can one get rid of these pesky little buggers?
		+
		+	-Glimmermore
		+	(cjohnson65@houston.rr.com)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 25 January 2006
Line 26:		Line 26:

	: ok, but on a ''universal'' scale, that's still a lot of cargopods to account for, eh? it's not like there's a shortage of them. pods, maybe ;) [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]		: ok, but on a ''universal'' scale, that's still a lot of cargopods to account for, eh? it's not like there's a shortage of them. pods, maybe ;) [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]
−
		+	: ''just a good avertising ploy actually: just paste a big sticker on all containers you use. Traders are not often going to waste time getting the things off, just paste new customs stickers over them.'' --[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 20:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

	-my little trumble- ;)		-my little trumble- ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 25 January 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	They don't give them away - only a small percentage of the cans with the Trumbble advertising on the side contain viable trumbles. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 16:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)		They don't give them away - only a small percentage of the cans with the Trumbble advertising on the side contain viable trumbles. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 16:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	: ok, but on a ''universal'' scale, that's still a lot of cargopods to account for, eh? it's not like there's a shortage of them. pods, maybe ;) [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]


Line 29:		Line 31:

	--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 16:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 16:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	: that would be a twisted product dwarfed subspecies with extra big eyes and lashes. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 25 January 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:

	They don't give them away - only a small percentage of the cans with the Trumbble advertising on the side contain viable trumbles. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 16:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)		They don't give them away - only a small percentage of the cans with the Trumbble advertising on the side contain viable trumbles. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 16:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	-my little trumble- ;)
		+
		+	--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 16:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 25 January 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:
	well, see my thinking is that the reason GenFun pushes trumbles so cheaply (and intentionally leaves freebees in space) is to make the real money on the cages. thus a firm name is needed.		well, see my thinking is that the reason GenFun pushes trumbles so cheaply (and intentionally leaves freebees in space) is to make the real money on the cages. thus a firm name is needed.
	:''Trumble-Jail, Trumble-Hold'', actually I quite like ''Trumble-Pen''. --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 15:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)		:''Trumble-Jail, Trumble-Hold'', actually I quite like ''Trumble-Pen''. --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 15:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	They don't give them away - only a small percentage of the cans with the Trumbble advertising on the side contain viable trumbles. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 16:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 25 January 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:
	I was thinking of the consumer base for the product, and thought trumble owners who think of them as pets (vs pests) would be the majority target group of GenFun. (young girls + cavia's).		I was thinking of the consumer base for the product, and thought trumble owners who think of them as pets (vs pests) would be the majority target group of GenFun. (young girls + cavia's).
	--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 15:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 15:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	well, see my thinking is that the reason GenFun pushes trumbles so cheaply (and intentionally leaves freebees in space) is to make the real money on the cages. thus a firm name is needed.
		+	:''Trumble-Jail, Trumble-Hold'', actually I quite like ''Trumble-Pen''. --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 15:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 25 January 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:
	you think? a trader would need to feel he's getting some security for his money, and by then be too fed up or incompetent to scorch them off..		you think? a trader would need to feel he's getting some security for his money, and by then be too fed up or incompetent to scorch them off..
	: ''Trumble-Nest'' ? --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 14:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)		: ''Trumble-Nest'' ? --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 14:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	That would sound like a nightmare to an afflicted trader. :)
		+
		+	I was thinking of the consumer base for the product, and thought trumble owners who think of them as pets (vs pests) would be the majority target group of GenFun. (young girls + cavia's).
		+	--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 15:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)