Talk:Other fictitious magazines - Revision history

Murgh at 13:21, 25 January 2006

2006-01-25T13:21:33Z

Aegidian at 08:27, 25 January 2006

2006-01-25T08:27:01Z

Aegidian at 07:55, 25 January 2006

2006-01-25T07:55:59Z

Murgh at 23:03, 24 January 2006

2006-01-24T23:03:58Z

Arexack at 22:34, 24 January 2006

2006-01-24T22:34:11Z

Rxke at 22:19, 24 January 2006

2006-01-24T22:19:13Z

Arexack at 19:21, 24 January 2006

2006-01-24T19:21:49Z

New page

Disclaimer:
The cobra3 artwork is not mine.
This cover was made for fun, not for any other purpose.
--[[User:Arexack|Arexack]] 19:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 25 January 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	What rot! 'you could you' is a perfectly valid construct in Thargoid grammar - a subtle pun on the part of the article's author. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 07:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)		What rot! 'you could you' is a perfectly valid construct in Thargoid grammar - a subtle pun on the part of the article's author. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 07:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	genius! no wonder they're hated by self-righteous academics. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 25 January 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:
	ok. now the typo is justified. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]		ok. now the typo is justified. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]

−	What rot! 'you could you' is a perfectly valid construct in Thargoid grammar - a subtle pun on the part of the ~~artilcle~~'s author. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 07:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)	+	What rot! 'you could you' is a perfectly valid construct in Thargoid grammar - a subtle pun on the part of the article's author. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 07:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:55, 25 January 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	ok. now the typo is justified. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]		ok. now the typo is justified. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]
		+
		+	What rot! 'you could you' is a perfectly valid construct in Thargoid grammar - a subtle pun on the part of the artilcle's author. --[[User:Aegidian\|Aegidian]] 07:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 24 January 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Blame Giles' offspring, they must have been distracting him from his more important task in life. ;)--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 22:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)		Blame Giles' offspring, they must have been distracting him from his more important task in life. ;)--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 22:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	ok. now the typo is justified. [[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 24 January 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Maybe all those well-paid elitist writers too high on megaweed? --[[User:Rxke\|Rxke]] 22:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)		Maybe all those well-paid elitist writers too high on megaweed? --[[User:Rxke\|Rxke]] 22:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	Blame Giles' offspring, they must have been distracting him from his more important task in life. ;)--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 22:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 24 January 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This cover was made for fun, not for any other purpose.		This cover was made for fun, not for any other purpose.
	--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 19:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Arexack\|Arexack]] 19:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	Beautiful. But... Witchcraft has a typo: 'you could you fly...'
		+
		+	Maybe all those well-paid elitist writers too high on megaweed? --[[User:Rxke\|Rxke]] 22:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)