Talk:Oolite/Ships - Revision history

Murgh at 13:13, 6 January 2006

2006-01-06T13:13:46Z

RavenRed at 12:45, 6 January 2006

2006-01-06T12:45:44Z

Murgh at 12:43, 6 January 2006

2006-01-06T12:43:01Z

Rxke at 11:19, 6 January 2006

2006-01-06T11:19:23Z

New page

Not sure where you want to go with this...
Winston said he wanted to make ship-templates for the different mayor Elite versions/variations (Oolite being one of them)
This page would then list those Oolite-specific ones?
--[[User:Rxke|Rxke]] 11:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 6 January 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Depends on whether you want a lot of pages for the one ship or single ones. My preference would be to have multiple ship-stat boxes on single pages. Yes, it's a bit clunky, but it at least keeps them organisationally simple. Is the non-game related data that different (sorry, still with M$, waiting eagerly for the PC port) --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]]		::Depends on whether you want a lot of pages for the one ship or single ones. My preference would be to have multiple ship-stat boxes on single pages. Yes, it's a bit clunky, but it at least keeps them organisationally simple. Is the non-game related data that different (sorry, still with M$, waiting eagerly for the PC port) --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]]
		+
		+	:::no I'm sure there's a handsome way to merge the different takes on the ships onto the one page. the way it is heading, the ship-entries have landed in the FFE section, indicating exclusive plans, but assuming they'll be put in a neutral place, it's a good plan.--[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:45, 6 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	--[[User:Rxke\|Rxke]] 11:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Rxke\|Rxke]] 11:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
	:yes. stands to reason that in the forest of FFE ships, there should be a clean oolite overview. waiting to hear more on this though if these should all link to the FFE shipdescriptions with classic elite/oolite subcategories, or if it would be so terrible for them to have their own pages.. is after all an Elite/Oolite Asp Mk II the same as an Asp explorer? --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 12:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)		:yes. stands to reason that in the forest of FFE ships, there should be a clean oolite overview. waiting to hear more on this though if these should all link to the FFE shipdescriptions with classic elite/oolite subcategories, or if it would be so terrible for them to have their own pages.. is after all an Elite/Oolite Asp Mk II the same as an Asp explorer? --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 12:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Depends on whether you want a lot of pages for the one ship or single ones. My preference would be to have multiple ship-stat boxes on single pages. Yes, it's a bit clunky, but it at least keeps them organisationally simple. Is the non-game related data that different (sorry, still with M$, waiting eagerly for the PC port) --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 6 January 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This page would then list those Oolite-specific ones?		This page would then list those Oolite-specific ones?
	--[[User:Rxke\|Rxke]] 11:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)		--[[User:Rxke\|Rxke]] 11:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
		+	:yes. stands to reason that in the forest of FFE ships, there should be a clean oolite overview. waiting to hear more on this though if these should all link to the FFE shipdescriptions with classic elite/oolite subcategories, or if it would be so terrible for them to have their own pages.. is after all an Elite/Oolite Asp Mk II the same as an Asp explorer? --[[User:Murgh\|Murgh]] 12:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)