Talk:First Encounters - Revision history

62.253.64.19 at 09:50, 17 January 2006

2006-01-17T09:50:08Z

62.253.64.19 at 09:49, 17 January 2006

2006-01-17T09:49:53Z

62.253.64.19 at 09:47, 17 January 2006

2006-01-17T09:47:49Z

62.253.64.19 at 09:47, 17 January 2006

2006-01-17T09:47:32Z

Jack Hamtilon at 09:19, 17 January 2006

2006-01-17T09:19:47Z

Winston: Ships?

2006-01-04T11:25:32Z

Ships?

RavenRed at 00:21, 4 January 2006

2006-01-04T00:21:01Z

Winston: Looks good

2006-01-03T23:15:28Z

Looks good

RavenRed at 22:56, 3 January 2006

2006-01-03T22:56:12Z

New page

Does this look like the kind of format we want? (NB: Check the subcategories page at the bottom. Each of these should branch off from "First Encounters") --[[User:RavenRed|RavenRed]] 22:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 Being that it is illegal to own JJFFE and illegal for him to make it, should we be advertising it on a wiki?
-''Well, if you start to go down that road, all of us who have a link to JJFFE on our websites could be in trouble! However, your point is well taken; I will add something to the JJFFE page to this effect.''
+''Well, if you start to go down that road, all of us who have a link to JJFFE on our websites could be in trouble! However, your point is well taken; I will add something to the JJFFE page to this effect.''<br>
 ''On second thoughts, I'll leave it. The situation is explained perfectly well on John's page.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:49, 17 January 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	''Well, if you start to go down that road, all of us who have a link to JJFFE on our websites could be in trouble! However, your point is well taken; I will add something to the JJFFE page to this effect.''		''Well, if you start to go down that road, all of us who have a link to JJFFE on our websites could be in trouble! However, your point is well taken; I will add something to the JJFFE page to this effect.''
		+	''On second thoughts, I'll leave it. The situation is explained perfectly well on John's page.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 17 January 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Being that it is illegal to own JJFFE and illegal for him to make it, should we be advertising it on a wiki?		Being that it is illegal to own JJFFE and illegal for him to make it, should we be advertising it on a wiki?

−	Well, if you start to go down that road, all of us who have a link to JJFFE on our websites could be in trouble! However, your point is well taken; I will add something to the JJFFE page to this effect.	+	''Well, if you start to go down that road, all of us who have a link to JJFFE on our websites could be in trouble! However, your point is well taken; I will add something to the JJFFE page to this effect.''

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 17 January 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Being that it is illegal to own JJFFE and illegal for him to make it, should we be advertising it on a wiki?		Being that it is illegal to own JJFFE and illegal for him to make it, should we be advertising it on a wiki?
		+
		+	Well, if you start to go down that road, all of us who have a link to JJFFE on our websites could be in trouble! However, your point is well taken; I will add something to the JJFFE page to this effect.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 17 January 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Hm, yes. I think ships should have pages in their own right perhaps with a disambiguation page for where the ship appears in more than one (conflicting) version of the game. The Cobra Mk.3 is essentially the same for FE:2 and FFE, so you'd have Cobra Mk III (FE2/FFE) and Cobra Mk III (Classic Elite).		Hm, yes. I think ships should have pages in their own right perhaps with a disambiguation page for where the ship appears in more than one (conflicting) version of the game. The Cobra Mk.3 is essentially the same for FE:2 and FFE, so you'd have Cobra Mk III (FE2/FFE) and Cobra Mk III (Classic Elite).
		+
		+
		+	== JJ ==
		+
		+	Being that it is illegal to own JJFFE and illegal for him to make it, should we be advertising it on a wiki?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 4 January 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Why thank you! I'm thinking that ships could perhaps be standalone names rather than sub-pages, however, as some are not unique to an individual game (Cobra Mk III for example). We could then include the game-specific info on the single Ship Page. --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]] 00:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)		Why thank you! I'm thinking that ships could perhaps be standalone names rather than sub-pages, however, as some are not unique to an individual game (Cobra Mk III for example). We could then include the game-specific info on the single Ship Page. --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]] 00:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Ships? ==
		+
		+	Hm, yes. I think ships should have pages in their own right perhaps with a disambiguation page for where the ship appears in more than one (conflicting) version of the game. The Cobra Mk.3 is essentially the same for FE:2 and FFE, so you'd have Cobra Mk III (FE2/FFE) and Cobra Mk III (Classic Elite).

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 4 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	It looks good to me. I'm sort of new at this Wiki thing, so I have to defer to the more experienced! Subcategories will help the main page from getting cluttered but allow things like a 'How to install' subcategory for things like FFE which is an article in its own right.		It looks good to me. I'm sort of new at this Wiki thing, so I have to defer to the more experienced! Subcategories will help the main page from getting cluttered but allow things like a 'How to install' subcategory for things like FFE which is an article in its own right.
		+
		+	Why thank you! I'm thinking that ships could perhaps be standalone names rather than sub-pages, however, as some are not unique to an individual game (Cobra Mk III for example). We could then include the game-specific info on the single Ship Page. --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]] 00:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 3 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Does this look like the kind of format we want? (NB: Check the subcategories page at the bottom. Each of these should branch off from "First Encounters") --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]] 22:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)		Does this look like the kind of format we want? (NB: Check the subcategories page at the bottom. Each of these should branch off from "First Encounters") --[[User:RavenRed\|RavenRed]] 22:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Looks good ==
		+
		+	It looks good to me. I'm sort of new at this Wiki thing, so I have to defer to the more experienced! Subcategories will help the main page from getting cluttered but allow things like a 'How to install' subcategory for things like FFE which is an article in its own right.