Elite Wiki talk:Manual of Style - Revision history

Psylem: Discussing Ulite Namespace

2013-12-07T14:45:09Z

Discussing Ulite Namespace

2009-07-29T20:42:33Z

2009-07-29T20:42:24Z

2009-07-29T20:41:58Z

2009-07-29T20:41:07Z

2009-04-20T17:35:53Z

2008-07-20T07:42:00Z

New page: Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!

New page

Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 7 December 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Ulite Namespace ==
		+
		+	Hi Folks, I've moved all the Ulite pages to be prefixed with Ulite. I've copied the convention used by this category.... http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php/Category:Oolite_JavaScript_Reference
		+
		+	Since it's fairly obscure stuff, I didn't think it was fair to take titles such as "Documentation" and "Overview". Some of the other pages had (Ulite) at the end of them. --[[User:Psylem\|Psylem]] 14:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	== Is this supposed to be there? ==
		+
	Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!		Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 29 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.		[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.

−	([[User:Diederick\|Diederick]]) agrees as well. Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam?	+	[[User:Diederick\|Diederick]] agrees as well. Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 29 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.		[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.

−	Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam? ~~([[User:Diederick\|Diederick]])~~	+	([[User:Diederick\|Diederick]]) agrees as well. Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 29 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.		[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.

−	Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam?	+	Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam? ([[User:Diederick\|Diederick]])

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 29 July 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.		[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.
		+
		+	Who wrote the original style manual? Can (s)he confirm this is spam?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 20 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!		Is this supposed to be there? or is this more spam? doesn't sound like a style manual to me!
		+
		+	[[User:Lukjad007\|lukjad007]] Agreed. This looks more like an add then a manual on how stuff should be written.